Coming Soon: More Foreclosures

More than 1.7 million homeowners were verging on foreclosure this fall, making it likely that these houses will soon end up on the market one way or the other, driving down overall housing values.

“We’re going to be dealing with high levels of distressed (sales) in the marketplace for at least a couple of years,” says Mark Fleming, chief economist of researcher First American CoreLogic, which has been studying the problem.

Some real estate practitioners say they fear that this onslaught is coming.

“We’ve been in recovery mode for most of the year. How many foreclosures do they have to dump on the market to affect that? I don’t know,” says Deborah Farmer, owner of StarLight Realty in Tampa, Fla. “Any house priced under $225,000 will be affected by a large increase in foreclosures in this market.”

Source: Associated Press, Alan Zibel (12/17/2009)

Fitch Projects More RMBS Re-Defaults as HAMP Disappoints

Servicers of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) continue to increase loss mitigation resolutions, including a significant push in the number of loan modifications, according to a report from Fitch Ratings.

As of September 2009, roughly 10% of all RMBS loans and 25% of all subprime loans received at least one modification. A year ago, servicers modified only 3% of all loans, and 7% of subprime loans, according to the report.

Fitch estimated a “conservative” projection of 65% to 75% of subprime delinquencies of 60 days or more that will re-default after 12 months post-modification.

“As in prior statements, market pressures to allow more aggressive [modifications], continued home price declines, and the economy’s effect on job losses factor into this projection,” according to Fitch analysts.

The projection includes re-defaults on loans that received a second and third modification after the first one failed. Roughly 11% of all modified RMBS loans received a second modification, and of the modifications done in Q308, 17% were re-modified, according to the report.

The monthly modification volume dropped from the peak in the middle of 2009, because loan modifications under the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) are not considered complete until a three-month trial finishes.

Through HAMP, the US Treasury Department allocates capped incentives to servicers for the modification of loans on the verge of foreclosure.

HAMP’s first modifications did not begin to complete the trial period until early July and are not included in the January through June 2009 results, according to the report. But cumulative modifications increased during the first half of 2009 as servicers continued non-HAMP modifications.

“Initial indications suggest the conversion from trial mod under HAMP to actual finalized
modification status has been disappointing,” according to Fitch analysts.

Through September 2009, there has been no “pick-up” in modification activity stemming from the completion of HAMP trial modifications.

According to[1] a report from the Congressional Oversight Panel (COP), which reviews actions taken by the Treasury, only 1,711 of the 360,000 trial modifications started passed out of the HAMP trial period and into permanence as of September 1.

A Snow Ball’s Chance in Hell

In my last post, I shared with my readers some soon-to-be-released research on the FDIC and its upcoming challenges. If you haven’t read it, you should.

In tonight’s reading I came across another significant fact worth sharing: According to the New York Times account, ” Fannie (Mae) and Freddie (Mac) now buy or guarantee almost two-thirds of all new mortgages. The Federal Housing Administration guarantees another 25 percent.”

Put another way, the Gov’t is financing 9 out of 10 new mortgages in the United States.

Hmmmm…….

With the S&P500 over 55% off its lows, one could say that the stock market has priced in a V-shaped economic recovery. Damn the torpedoes, baby!

But wait! How could this be? Is the recession really over?

Not so fast, partner!!

  1. We’ve got banks going broke, with more to come, and no money to lend in the meantime.
  2. The only reason that houses are selling at all is because the Gov’t is lending the money, plus giving 1st time buyers a free $8,000 for buying a house. (how else could houses sell with unemployment as high as it is?)
  3. And heck, if you bought a new car recently, you’d have received another $4500 as part of the cash for clunkers trade in program, also courtesy of Uncle Sam.
  4. Delinquency rates are home loans are still extremely high
  5. Oh, and did I mention there’s no jobs?

Seems to me that without all the Gov’t stimulus, GDP would be so far into the toilet, we’d be seeing the D-word instead of “The Great Recession”.

Despite this, the stock market is going no where but up. I don’t know about you, but I don’t see ANY part of this picture that says “sustainable economic recovery”.

What’s the point of this rant?

Do you honestly believe that decades of excess, speculation, and outright fiscal lunacy can honestly be undone in a year or two?

I don’t know about you, but I don’t buy it. If I was a betting man, I’d say how about a “snowball’s chance in hell?”

So what should you do if you are an investor? Same advice as yesterday:

  1. cut your living expenses to the bone
  2. raise as much cash as possible
  3. do as many seller financed purchases as possible (as seller financed deals are also the easiest to renegotiate if needed)
  4. focus on flipping short sales, as opposed to fixing & flipping REOs, because it can be done without the need to tie up any capital

Your comments are always welcome,
TRD

A Peferct Foreclosure Storm

I came across the following quote in my morning reading this morning, and, as I believe it to be absolutely true, thought I’d be remiss if I didn’t pass it along.

Oh, and one other item I thought I’d share was some points that were covered in a conversation I had recently with a Realtor in San Diego who does a lot of business in Rancho Santa Fe (where are the very, very expensive homes are). He told me that he is starting to see more and more million-dollar-plus price drops in that market as well as more and more of these “wealthy” owners are coming to him asking how much they could get if they sold their house in today’s market.

In other words, the super-rich appear to be starting to feel the pinch just like everybody else.

——

“If the economy is improving, do we really have millions more
foreclosures coming? According to the U.S. Treasury, the answer is
yes. In written testimony to Congress, Assistant Secretary for
Financial Institutions, Michael Barr said that, regardless of the
success of mortgage modification efforts, we should still expect
millions more foreclosures.

Mr. Barr’s testimony is certainly not welcome news for those
anticipating a significant recovery in the housing market. In fact, it
is an indication that significant recovery is still years away.

And there are other factors that confirm the fragile state of both the
economy and the housing market. Recent reports have indicated that
there are almost 3 million active, interest-only loans with a total
value of almost $1 trillion, with loans of about $500 billion set to
reset within the next 30 months. Then we have a large group of Option
Arm mortgages set to recast during the next 2 years. These loans have
a combined value of more than $125 billion.

The rising number of bankruptcies, up 36% in the second quarter over
last year, with wealthy families filing at double that rate, creates a
“perfect storm” of disastrous consequences for the housing market.
With the likely prospect of millions more foreclosures coming, home
prices and home sales will remain depressed until the market can
achieve stabilization. And achieving stabilization will be a slow and
painful process.”

—–

Your comments are always welcome,
TRD

Free Groceries for Life

I just finished a post detailing why I thought the housing recovery was further out than many think, and just as soon as I posted it, I started thinking about the concept of control.

What do I mean?

Instead of worrying about the economy and the never ending data-points that pundits (like me) are continually blabbering about, might I suggest that you focus your energy on the items in your economic existence over which you have direct control.

Burn Rate = Fate
Essentially this boils down to one simple concept; it is easier to lower your overhead than it is to raise you income. Moreover, when you earn a dollar, you must pay tax on that dollar, whereas when you save a dollar, you get to retain and then re-invest that entire dollar.

In the last 3 months, I made a decision to reduce the cost of my housing by 35%, or about $730 per month. We’ll come back to this in a minute.

Money spent is no longer available for investment
If you consider each dollar that you own as an employee, which I do, the act of spending a dollar is akin to firing an employee. And, unlike “real” employees, all “financial” employees are first class workers! How successful do you think your enterprise would be over 20 years if you continually fired your best employees? The answer is obvious.

It was this realization that made me want to sell my fancy car and buy a pickup truck. No matter how much I loved that car, it was never going to love me back. A nice rental house with tenants paying my mortgage, on the other hand, will love me for years to come.

Knowing what you are spending is one thing, knowing what it is costing you is quite another.
Using the $730/month that I’m no longer spending on my housing, lets look at how much it was actually costing me.

Assuming that I invest that $730/month an earn just 10% (and for those in my profession, earning 10% is the LOW end of what is easily possible) for 20 years, I will have amassed the tidy sum of $722,156 – probably enough to buy me groceries for at least a few months, don’t you think? Yes, there will be some taxes payable, however, if you have $0 and I have $722,156 before tax, I’m pretty sure I’ll be better off than you even after Uncle Sam’s share, no?

Your comments are always welcome,
TRD

Housing Production Dips in July as Tax Credit Expires, CBIA Announces

The story below, I believe, is further evidence that a housing recovery is yet further out than many believe.

Consider the following facts:

  1. unemployment is still very high
  2. consumer confidence is still very low
  3. the state is essentially broke
  4. last quarter’s GDP numbers were really just TARP spending
  5. Most of today’s first time buyers will be under water in 3 – 6 months as inventories inevitably rise (all those foreclosures have to be put up for sale at some point)
  6. used houses can be purchased for FAR below their replacement costs

The low end of the real estate market is on fire, to be sure; however, the only things driving it are low interest rates and an “artificial” lack of inventory. I can’t help but wonder how much longer that will last. Can you?

Your comments are always welcome,

TRD

August 24, 2009

SACRAMENTO – California homebuilders pulled back on new-home production in July as homebuyers retreated from housing markets around the state following the discontinuation of the successful homebuyer tax credit early in the month, the California Building Industry Association announced today.

“Our homebuilders reported a significant drop in traffic last month, largely due to the state closing the window on the homebuyer tax credit,” said Robert Rivinius, CBIA’s President and CEO, who noted that the Franchise Tax Board stopped taking applications for the $10,000 new-home credit at the beginning of July. “Activity stopped as quickly as it started, which is bad news for housing and the broader economy.”

more…

How to Use Someone Else’s Credit to Buy

In today’s market, getting multiple bank loans is a challenge. Fannie and Freddie limit an investor to 10 loans; however most banks will limit you to just four loans.

Assuming you’re in need of additional long term financing, what are you to do?

Partner up with another investor who hasn’t used up all their “slots” for loans!

For example; supposed I find a property at a great price, I would then go to my investor-partner and get him to close on it with a loan for most of the purchase price from a bank. He would then deed me 1/2 the property, and I would give him a note that said I owed him 1/2 of the money he put up for the down payment and closing costs.

For example:

CaseStudy

When the house is sold, the investor will receive the $10,000 payment on the note, plus, because he owns half the interest in the house, he will receive half the profits on the sale. If the house is held until it doubles in value, the investors $20,000 investment will have returned $120,000 to him. (plus a 50% share of the net rent during the holding period)

That equates to a whopping 18% per year, assuming it took 10 years for the house to double in value.

If an investor was doing this with me, I would handle all aspects of property management and we would split the cost of any repairs needed during the holding period. Talk about a hands off investment for my investing partner.

Switch to our mobile site